| | ||||||||||||||||
Okay, we just don’t get it. The Mini John Cooper Works is a tiny car to begin with and still Mini claims that the tiny tot could accommodate four plus some rear storage. Now, Mini has decided to make the Mini JCW even smaller - bringing it down to three meters in length - and they still claim it can fit four and have a decent size boot? Does anyone else question that? Besides being a very small car, the future model will also focus on efficiency. Under the hood there will be a new 1.5-liter, 3-cylinder engine turbocharged engine currently being developed by BMW. Given BMW’s work of EfficientDynamics, the engine will be capable of producing 150 HP as well as having a fuel consumption of 50mpg and CO2 emissions of just under 110g/km. These little updates, plus a low curb weight, will allow the Mini to make the 0-60mph sprint in under 7 seconds. The engine will also be offered with a stop/start system, brake energy regeneration, and an aerodynamic design. The official debut is expected to be made sometime in 2013 and will come with a price tag of £16,000. .
8 comments: Mini works on smaller John Cooper Works model So this whole review and not one mention about whether a mini clubman is actually utilitarian enough to warrant buying over the standard? Nothing about the what it’s like to drive the fastest factory Mini? Why not just review Summer Tires in the Winter and write about that. Nothing about what you can fit in it? Completely worthless review.
So this whole review and not one mention about whether a mini club man is actually utilitarian enough to warrant buying over the standard? Nothing about the what it’s like to drive the fastest factory Mini? Why not just review Summer Tires in the Winter and write about that. Nothing about what you can fit in it? Completely worthless review.
yeah, i have to agree about my high hopes for this post being quashed. i can understand a post about the awesomeness of traction control or stability control or ABS. also, why tire choice can make or break a car.
I hate the split-back rear gate. What was wrong with a lift gate or a gate that splits horizontally? It was annoying looking at it on 80s suburbans and it’s annoying now.
|
featured reviews:
| |||||||||||||||
Posted on
12.29.2010 @ 23:24