Top Speed Home
Cars   Motorcycles   Community   Car Games   wallpapers Pictures    
  Home » Cars » Car Reviews » Ford
>
  Register    
login  

2010 Ford Mustang


 
  Review  
 
   
Get the Flash Player to see the videos.
  Article summary:
Page 1 :  Ford Mustang

Page 2 :  Technology features

Page 2 :  Interior

Page 2 :  Improvments on the 2010 model

Page 2 :  Modern look

Page 2 :  Design

Page 2 :  Quieter than ever


It’s official: the 2010 mustang is out of the corral. After getting to see the myriad of preview pics, there’s now not a whole lot new to see. But it is refreshing to get a look at the full car.

Ford has been stuck with a tough issue: how do you update a retro car? Do you follow the path of the original? If Ford did that then the 2010 Mustang would bloated and on the path to have to be redesigned in 2014 to be replaced by a Focus-based Mustang II. Instead Ford let its retro design mature. In 2005 the current Mustang burst on the scene with a childlike innocence that said to the world, “Hey I’m back!” Now five years later, the car has matured into a teenager. It still looks very much like the happy child you once knew, but now his brow has permanently furrowed, and he’s more aggressive.

Everything on the outside of the car has gotten sleeker. The turn indicators have been incorporated into the design, the fog light fit in the grille better, the tail lamps have more curves, and the interior materials no longer have a shine that makes it look like it came from the dollar store. But these are minor improvements. What makes this a new car worth getting excited about is how it feels.

Ford had put the 2005 Mustang on an all-new platform (it’s first in about 25 years,) and the 2010 Mustang is Ford’s first chance at tweaking the chassis after five years of road development. The car still has an archaic live rear-axle, but now the set up is three-link rear suspension with a panhard bar. It’s not a rocket science leap forward, but it should keep the rear end in line while going fast on the streets.

The interior doesn’t change much in appearance or layout. It’s tough to stray to far from the original in a retro car. But as mentioned before, the materials are significantly upgraded. While it may look nice, the simple feel of sturdy materials makes the Mustang feel less like an economy car.

The 2010 Mustang will be initially offered with a choice of two engines: a 4.0-liter 60-degree V6 (carryover from the 2009 model) that delivers 210 at 5,300 rpm and a peak torque of 240 lb.-ft.; and a 4.6-liter 90-degree V8 (upgraded from the 2009 GT) with cold air induction that delivers 315 @ 6,000 rpm and a peak torque of 325 lb.-ft. @ 4,250 rpm. Both engines are mated to a standard 5-speed manual transmission.

Pricing shouldn’t stray too far from the original car, which means sticker prices of a little over $20,000 for the base model and about $28,000 for the Mustang GT.

Full details in the press release after the jump.


Press release

Lessons learned on the track and from specialty Mustangs mean even more fun for drivers of the new 2010 Ford Mustang – especially those who want to customize their powertrains.

Available for the 2010 Mustang are a 4.0-liter V-6 engine, which is rated at 210 horsepower and 240 pounds-feet of torque, and a 4.6-liter V-8 engine, which is rated at 315 horsepower and 325 pounds-feet of torque. Each is mated to five-speed manual or five-speed automatic transmissions.

8.

“We have fantastic engines,” said Chief Nameplate Engineer Paul Randle. “Our 4.6-liter, three-valve V-8 engine has won ‘Ward’s 10 Best’ for our years in a row and is the most-accessorized engine in the marketplace. Plus, Mustang customers love to personalize their cars, and our engine platforms allow them to do that.”

The Ford team uses advances gained through programs such as the Ford Racing Mustang Challenge and special editions to improve the 2010 Mustang.

Improvements inspired by the Bullitt program, for instance, are seen on the genuine polished-aluminum manual transmission knob and leather-wrapped shift knob, which support a short-throw, performance-based shifter originally launched on the feature car.

Horsepower gains on the V-8 are achieved by the cold-air induction system pioneered through Ford Racing Technology. The intake is tucked behind the driver-side headlamp, mounted in an air box specific to the Mustang. Extensive sealing modifications ensure cold air from the front of the Mustang feed the engine.

7.

A true ram-air system offered on a base GT vehicle is a first for Mustang.

“That means more horsepower and more torque in all driving conditions,” Randle said.

The redline for the V-8 is increased 250 rpm to 6,500, and revised calibration ensures the customer fully feels these changes.

Both the V-6 and V-8 engines have larger exhaust tips, growing to 3 and 3 ½ inches, respectively, up ½ inch from the previous model. The V-8 exhaust features polished tips.

“The 2010 Mustang runs great on regular fuel, and that is where we quote our peak numbers, but we also have a great dual-adaptive knock calibration that allows the 2010 Mustang to run on regular fuel as well as premium fuel, and the system figures it out itself,” said powertrain supervisor Chris Roxin. “It also improves the torque of the engine in the low- to mid-rpm range.”

The powertrain feel also is enhanced by intake and exhaust sound tuning that delivers Mustang’s signature sound. “All the better to hear that famous Mustang roar that’s been inspiring customers for more than four decade,” Randle said.

 


 1 
Technology features



19 comments: Ford Mustang


All things said, but fact is fact, Mustang WAS a great car, if these people continue to built these HP-less (performance less) cars then WAS will remain WAS. Ford gotta see that they have to compete. Everybody was expecting a better car after so many teasers, Cars like these are going to take the rest of american cars’s name down the drain
Posted on 12.29.2008

they will i hope, as long as the dont get rid of corvette racing i dont care what they do.
Posted on 12.21.2008

jtm, don’t bother with this guy. LS7BOYZ, GM and Chrysler have been granted a bail out of 17 billion, so its all good. GM won’t go down much as I wanted it to. Now lets see if your big 3 can deliver what they promised before March.
Posted on 12.20.2008

hey man chill i’m not saying the american car companies cant make great cars. i love vettes and vipers. the new challeneger looks sick and cant wait for the new camero to come out. all i’m saying is dont bash a skyline cus unless you’re driving something with a price tag around 300k chances are that the skyline will kick your in anything but a drag strip... and even then it can take on most cars there too.

like i love the pontiac GTO also a favorite of mine and i love classic muscle too.. my dad owns a 69 charger RT that i’d die for but dont diss a car just cus you dont like it. i’d love to buy american... well a viper or vette or challenger srt8 or the new camero ss when it comes out but for now i’ll settle with tuning my 240sx. hell i couldn’t afford to import a skyline anyways and sorry but i dont have 70k+ to throw out for a new r35 either. nobody’s buying cars right now the economy in america is right now man. every company needs a bailout so just chill

Posted on 12.18.2008

i got back ground on my cars. i love cars AMERICAN AND CARS FROM EURPORE. so dont come to with that u boy. how about u just shut the hell up and sit down because us americans made cars easier for assholes like u to buy. i support my country by having my parents buy a from the U.S. unlike u i live in detroit and if the big 3 go down most of my family will not have JOB u donkey raming so people like u guys is y the big 3 need a bail-out. so dont me and if u do u lose. so go home contemplate about how u ed up the big 3 z.
Posted on 12.17.2008

that was directed to the ls7 guy... not you AK47 just a little background info b4 he bashes a car is all
Posted on 11.24.2008

And your point being?
Posted on 11.24.2008

before you start throwing stats out the window you should do some research. first off... the r32 r33 and r34 are a 2.6 liter inline 6 twin turbo... they "officially" produce 276 hp and 280lbs of torque... but many have been dyno tested around 320hp and 315lb of torque... given the engine could produce much more... the japanese restrict boost on the skyline to around a total of 7 psi... thats 3.5 psi on each turbo. well most turbos operate around 7 psi each and the skyline could handle much more on stock internals so just raising each of the turbo boost to 7psi manually and removing the ecu which restricts the power even further you can easily surpass 400 hp... also the stock engine has a been detuned in the exhaust region as well... reseach has showed that the exhaust on the skyline reduces its power by nearly 30 hp as opposed to a catback exhaust...thats a pretty impressive gain for only reducing backpressure...

now the new r35 is a 3.8 liter v-6 twin turbo...independent dyno tests have shown power range from 415 all the way to 500 hp and close to the same on the torque side of things... this car is also detuned just to keep the power in this range which the tranny and other technology are suited for... there are multiple codes all in the engine and ecu which have to be broken if you are to tune the car at all....and to be honest nissan doesn’t want you tuning this car....

oh yea and these two cars are a good 30k cheaper than their stock competitors... so i mean if we can throw 30 k under the hood to match the price of your production car then hell our numbers would be insane....

dont get me wrong i love muscle cars but you’re argueing against a skyline... come on man like almost any other japanese car i could see your point but these cars outrun ferraris and lambos and porsches and stuff.... like really

Posted on 11.23.2008

Whoa! Whoa! Calm down domestic fanboy. Check the resale values of cars like Hondas and Toyotas and you’ll see how much value they have. Hell the Civic probably has a higher resale value than your stupid Cobalt. Car like Lexus have horizontal depreciation.

You also need to get your eyes checked if you think any version from the R32 to the R35 is no different from each other. The only thing similiar between the R32 and R34 was the inline RB26 DETT and they had 276hp because of a gentlemans agreement. Very few guys would know the difference between a base Vette and the ZR1. So much for your different looks.

And again- 10 more hp difference?! Dip$hit, subtract 276hp from the 473 0f the R35. What do you get?

Ring times, how much more power did the ZR1 have and how much less wieght and how much more does it cost? Both your ZR1 and ACR beat the GT-R around the Nurburgring by a couple of seconds. Thats 473 hp with a curb weight of 1750kg of the GT-R verses 600hp and 638hp of the ACR and ZR1 respectively, with both having a much lower curb weight, not to mention supersticky tyres while the GT-R has runflats. And a difference of a couple of seconds! Thats absolutely pathetic, you dimwitted moron. They should have scored in the lower sevens instead of 7.22.

As I said, it is because of idiots like you that GM and FORD are still selling cars because you would rather pay for crap built quality and $hitty interiors than cars with better quality and build which also happen to cost less or the same.

Posted on 11.23.2008

yall should be mad at yourself most of u live in U.S so u have to support ours cars even if they got y interiors but this is my country. yall support people that u cant understand what their say half of the time.the U.S makes the best cars in surtain markets u dumb . a have a 67 GTO and the resale value is high. on most japenise cars resale for alot less then when u brought it. the corvette is a great car even JC of top gear said the zr1 is a great car its alot different than a z06 if u read the what it say.

o yeah wats the different between a GTR r32 and a gtr r35 10 more hp when we americans make a new car we give alot more power a different look and a better sound out the V-8 so intill the an japenise car has the nurburgring record shut the -up and lay down

Posted on 11.21.2008

no i completely agree a sports car should have quick acceleration times... i mean i dont consider a hyundai tiburon a sports car even if it has the looks but what i’m saying is that if you count the mustang out of a the sports car classification solely bc of its acceleration then you also have to cut out all the other cars i listed... 350z... s2000 rx8 and a load of others that are frations of a sec slower than the mustang... but by no means do i consider the mustang a respectable sports car... its just a sports car... its suspension is crap... its engine is crap... i mean like you said a 3.5 liter dohc v-6 engine produces more hp than a 4.6 liter v-8 like wtf thats terrible... but it still is a sports car bc its relitively quick for its price... but i will agree handling comes into consideration when determining whether a car is a sports car or not... hence why i consider the s2000 even though its 7 tenths of a second slower than a mustang to be more of a sports car than the mustang as well as the rx8

i’m just saying that setting the supra to be the lowest standard of cars to be considered a sports car is being quite critical since the supra is respected around the world as being quite performance driven...

i’m only saying that a car doesn’t have to outrun a supra to be a sports car bc that would make nearly every affordable car on the market not sports cars including the 350z evo sti rx8 s2000 mustang camero challenger charger and even the base c6 vette would barely cut it into sports car classification...

it doesn’t have to be a super car to be a sports car.

Posted on 11.19.2008

LS7BOYZ, yes the Supra came out in 1979 and it hadn’t changed much until it stopped production in 2008. However the Mustang looks the same as it came out and it was the so called new model almost every year so it is basically an 80s Mustang.

And WRONG! The big 3 is dying because finally the American public have become smarter. Carrying a patriotic flag when buying a car is one of the dumbest things you can do. The big 3 is dying because for years they have given cars with shoddy interiors and unparalled unreliability.

It is people with your way of thinking that has led GM and Ford to constantly lower their standards knowing all the while that people like you would keep on buying the the garbage that you people regard as automotives. You are not getting the better deal when your car has a few more horsepower but a cheap interior. Example. the Cobalt SS. It is one heck of a car with plenty of performance but it fails in the interior department while costing the same as a base Mazda Speed 3. Yet almost every American site is full of Domestic fanboys harping on about the SS being the best.

If you people had actually criticised the manufacturers about the interior, they might have been improved. If you people had been angry about the new Mustangs having live rear suspensions, Ford might have changed them and you might have gotten an actual sportscar. Instead you people choose to put on your country flags around your shoulders and carry on about domestics being the best regardless. It doesn’t matter if its crap, its domestic so it must be good, is your line of thinking and that sadly is the reason the American automotive industry is failing, because of you people.

One more thing. How different is a ZR1 and an ACR from others Vettes and Vipers? My point exactly........

Posted on 11.19.2008

jtm, I disagree with you on one point. A sportscar should have quick acceleration figures, be lighter than conventional cars and most importantly handle well. The latter is something that I can guarantee you won’t find in a car with a live suspension. I doubt any Mustang can take a corner worth a lick. Is the Camaro a sportscar? With the new independant suspension setup, of course it is. Z06? It has a leaf suspension. A sportscar? It light and it can take corners, not as smoothly but it can.

350Z to a Mustang? Thats also not fair because the Z has a fully independant suspension. Not to mentionm it has a V6 running with 3.5 L and delivering 305 hp to 270 lb-ft of torque. Sure the Mustang has 10 more hp with 325 torque on a 4.6L V8.How that engine made Wards ten best list is beyond me because the ratings, as you said, the engine ratings are garbage. Iam also pretty sure the Z wil keep up with this Mustang in straight lines and hand the muscle car it own a$$ on a track.

Posted on 11.19.2008

hey man i’m not bashing muscle cars the viper is one of my favorite cars of all time... i’m just saying that the mustang cant keep up with the supra but its bc the supra is twin turbo... the other guy was saying the mustang shouldn’t be called a sports car cus it cant keep up with a supra... i just said saying that if a car cant keep up with a supra then its not a sports car is setting pretty high expectations for all sports cars... i mean a gto with an ls2 has a hard time keepin up with a stock supra... so does a 350z... i was just sayin that if you say to be a sports car it has to keep up with a supra automatically eliminates about 80 percent of the cars on the current market... even performance ones that are under 60k dollars
Posted on 11.19.2008

u said a 92 supra which is 16 years old thats really old and u want to compare it to a 2010 mustang. the mustang look better way better sound better and has a all american V-8 and its people like u that is killing the U.S BIG 3 buying those japenise peice of . the ZR-1 and ACR will make it look like a pirus so dont come on the mustang with that old so go home and come to the present day cars ferraris lambos vettes and 911’s so u can say what ever u want but the 2000 and present day cars are way better and look better by far i bet u a an overfinch range rover sport will blow out an supra.
Posted on 11.18.2008

but i agree something should be done with this single overhead cam 4.6 liter sorry excuse for a v-8...

ford needs to do some research... hell at least make it a dohc and 5 liter to satisfy the extra weight of the extra cylinders

Posted on 11.18.2008

you do realize that even though it cant keep up with a supra... there really aren’t that many cars on the road today at all that can stock... cars like the supra skyline 300zx 3000gt and other stock turbo’d cars can outrun most cars on the road today... does that mean the rx8 isn’t a sports car... it cant keep up... is a honda s2000 not a sports car... it cant keep up either... realistically you have to realize the supra is twin turbo’d ... which is the about the equivalent of a 5 liter or bigger v-8... and thats on low boost... factory

with upgraded ecu alone the boost can go up on a supra and it can outrun most vettes and other cars on the road... including an evo and an sti... so comparing the supra to a mustang is a little unfair... how not to mention a used supra still cost more than a new mustang if in good condition and low miles... try maybe a 350z to a mustang... thats at least around equal playing grounds

Posted on 11.18.2008

Rodrigo315 is right! Mustang’s V8 cant even take on a ’92 Supra turbo (320 hp, I6 3 litre), And shame on those who call this thing a sports car!!! Horrible
Posted on 11.18.2008

No body care Ford is going out of business nothing can help them and there car !
Posted on 11.18.2008

*Registration is required to post in this forum





Still don't have User-ID?


Forgot your password?


Picture Gallery (80)
  • ford mustang 2
  • ford mustang 3
  • ford mustang 4
  • ford mustang 5
  • ford mustang 6
  • ford mustang 7
Picture Gallery (80)


  More Ford Mustang   

  Ford Mustang Pictures