| | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jaguar released information about its revisions to the European versions of its oldie-but-goodie XJ. Although there was no official word on what will make it across the pond in 2009, we can take a pretty good guess. Since the car is up for a complete redesign in 2010, there is not a whole lot of innovation expected for 2009. New things to expect in from this XJ include improved seats with cooling function, standard navigation, parking radar, and bi-xenon lighting. One thing that we don’t expect is for any of the 2.7-liter diesel versions to make the boat trip. Instead we’ll solider on with the big ’ol 4.2-liter V8. Oddly enough Jaguar is calling the supercharged version of this engine the "Super V8", instead of any mention of the XJR (which is one level below the Super in the U.S.). This may suggest the XJR name will be dropped in anticipation of the V8 getting enlarged to 5.0-liters, and/or the XJR reappearing with the 5.0-liter engine at a later date. The pricing revealed for the 2009 XJ line is within £1,000 or less than last year’s pricing. Hopefully that will sat that way for the States too. Press release after the jump. Press release Jaguar has revised the line-up of the award-winning XJ, offering customers even better value-for-money with a host of additional features now offered at no extra cost. The Sport Premium specification is no longer available in the XJ.XJ Super V8 4.2-litre Petrol – The Super V8 is priced at £57,760 and features the critically acclaimed 4.2-litre supercharged engine previously found in the XJR and boasts a luxurious interior with chrome side vents and Rich Oak veneer as standard. At a Glance
7 comments: Jaguar XJ lol very well put... the mustang is a great comparison to a supercharger lol... it makes sense that the supercharged 5 liter v-8 in the mustang would only make 500hp... when a 2.6 liter turbo rb26 can make around 700... that is a perfect example of how superchargers are obsolete
Why not? Because superchargers spell nimwits who haven’t learnt to play with the revs. Like jtm said, turbos nowadays are nearly lagless and can provide much higher levels of boost. It would be easier just to get a naturally aspirated engine or if you want plenty of thrust, get a turbo monster. The no lag excuse used to work back in the times when turbos had plenty of lag and engines had miserable hps per liter. Now its not needed. All the bigtime horsepower players have turbos or are naturally aspirated. Superchargers are like the Mustangs antiquated rear suspension, laughable in these times. yea except a turbo on a v-8 would have near instant response anyways and provide such a higher boost and hp increase lol... superchargers are kinda obsolete now days with dual ball bearing turbos that hit full spool at 3k rmp... like why even bother with a supercharger that can only hit like 14psi boost if you’re lucky when a turbo quite a few turbos go over 20psi.. hell if you’re gonna use a supercharger at least make it a twincharger system lol Why not? They use turbos in the 2.7 diesel, and something has to be said for the fact that supercharged sounds a lot better than turbocharged on the sales brochures...
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Posted on
12.8.2008 @ 05:00