| | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 1 : Porsche 911 Turbo Page 2 : Engine and performances Page 3 : Chassis and Safety Page 3 : Specifications Page 3 : Prices Page 3 : Competitors and press reviews Engine and performancesIntroducing the new 911 Turbo making its debut at the 2009 Frankfurt Motor Show, Porsche is once again setting the highest standard in the high-performance sports car segment. Indeed, the development borne out by the Turbo for greater efficiency on lower emissions as well as extra driving dynamics on less weight points convincingly into the future. To be specific, the new top-of-the-range Porsche production sports car consumes up to 16 per cent less fuel, develops 20 bhp more power, delivers 30 Nm/22 lb-ft more torque, and accelerates up to 8 per cent faster on a reduction in weight of up to 25 kg or 55 lb – not to mention the enhanced driving dynamics offered by the car. As in the past, the Porsche Turbo comes as standard with a six-speed manual gearbox. As an option the turbocharged power unit may for the first time be combined with the sevenspeed PDK Porsche-Doppelkupplungsgetriebe which, unlike Tiptronic S on the former model, also comes with a limited-slip differential. In over - land traffic both the Coupé and the Cabriolet, thanks to PDK with its optimum gearshift and the transmission of power with minimum losses, may easily return fuel consumption of less than 10 litres/100 kilometres (28.2 mpg imp or better) (extra-urban fuel consumption to the EU5 standard: Coupé 8.1 ltr/100 (34.9 mpg imp), Cabriolet 8.2 ltr/100 km (34.4 mpg imp). The overall balance of CO2 emissions has improved by an even greater margin, with CO2 down by almost 18 per cent thanks to the changeover from a converter automatic trans - mission to the Doppelkupplungsgetriebe. Emissions are also down on the manual gearbox model by approximately 11 per cent. Top performer also in acceleration and driving dynamicsEven with its manual gearbox featured as standard, the new Turbo accelerates from a stand - still to 100 km/h in just 3.7 seconds (Cabriolet 3.8 seconds). With the PDK gearbox the new Turbo completes the same exercise another tenth of a second faster, and with the optional Sport Chrono Package Turbo featuring dynamic engine mounts for the first time, the top-ofthe- range 911 offers an even higher standard of performance still, the integrated Overboost function increasing maximum torque by 50 Nm/37 lb-ft to no less than 700 Nm/516 lb-ft. This means acceleration from 0 – 100 km/h with the Sport Button pushed in just 3.6 seconds (Cabriolet 3.7 seconds) and, in combination with PDK, the Sport Plus Button and Launch Control, the fastest conceivable acceleration to 100 km/h is in a staggering 3.4 seconds (Cabriolet 3.5 seconds). As a yet further highlight, the Sport Plus Button on the PDK gearbox activates the Race Track Gearshift Strategy with the shortest conceivable shift times and optimum gearshift points when shifting up and down. New: Porsche Torque Vectoring PTV for even higher speeds in bendsThe performance of the new 911 Turbo enhanced to an even higher standard goes hand in hand with driving dynamics even more outstanding than ever before. Accordingly, the further A fundamental point of Porsche’s safety philosophy is that brake power must always exceed engine power several times over. Precisely this is why the front wheels come with six-piston swing-calliper disc brakes measuring 350 millimetres or 8.9” in diameter. The four-piston swing-calliper brakes at the rear also come with discs measuring 350 millimetres across. Like all models in the 911 range, the new 911 Turbo is also available with PCCB Porsche Ceramic Composite Brakes with ceramic discs measuring 380 millimetres/9.6” in diameter at the front for even faster response, very good resistance to fading and absolutely no corrosion. A further advantage of PCCB is the reduction of weight versus the standard brakeswith grey-cast iron discs by approximately 18 kg or 40 lb.
10 comments: Porsche 911 Turbo Ignoring cost, the LFA is the all-around greatest supercar ever built and every expert who’s driven it will tell you the same thing.
Much like the Supra that preceeded it, the LFA is not geared for 0-60 but for 60-120 acceleration as you would use when coming out of a corner when it actually counts, but 0-60 and torque don’t matter anyway if the LFA is still faster around any track you want to run them on. Also, the LFA’s 0-60 time was recorded with two passengers in the car as stated on the Lexus website, while the 911 turbo’s was done with just the driver as usual. The LFA isn’t a competitor for the 911 anyway, though. The 911 turbo is a very sporty 2+2 GT car available to anyone who can afford it; the LFA is an ultra-exclusive, record-breaking racecar with a Lexus interior. The 911 turbo competes against the R8 V10, SL AMG and Nissan GT-R; the LFA with the Apollo and CCX.
It was actually 7:24... and the Porsche is more powerful. The Porsche has 516lbs-ft of torque while the LF-A only has 354, and the LF-A has a 4.8liter V10... the Turbo has a 3.8litre six-cylinder boxer engine. The LF-A does 0-62 MPH (100 km/h) in 3.7 seconds, while the Turbo does the same at 3.4. I’m sorry man, but the Turbo is more powerful.
The LFA is inferior to the 911 turbo? The 911 turbo lapped the Nurburgring - which Porsche rented out for the day - in 7:39, while the LFA did it in 7:13 with traffic, bested only by the Apollo Sport’s 7:12. With the exception of "heritage," all the 911 turbo has over the LFA is a pair of back seats. Not that it isn’t a great car - I’d certainly buy it over a GT-R - but nothing can compete with the LFA.
Still, Turbo or GT3, they are both still magnificent cars. It’s what you would expect from a Porsche. I don’t think that it’s fair to compare a Porsche to a Lexus, except maybe the LF-A which is inferior to the Turbo, but still. The LF-A is not bad. It looks amazing, but the Turbo is just more powerful, not to mention the huge $250,000 gap between the two. I would most definitely buy the Turbo.
What’s with this when for the same price you could buy an Evora AND a GS 350? The 911 turbo is a great car especially considering the quality and refinement that comes with its performance, but it’s way over-priced.
"as much acceleration as a Colonial Fleet Raptor," Wouldn’t a Viper be more impressive than a hulking transport/ECM multi-purpose utility craft? After all, Vipers are the Porsche of space.
Well, Porche has forever been using boxer flat sixes with 3.8L or similiar displacement, so they are bound to have worked out the best mileage the engines have to offer. That said, I’d rather have the cheaper GT3. 415hp from a 6 cylinder is just insane.
They never really ran out of idea, do they? The 2010 Porsche 911 Turbo is more environment friendly than its previous model. And I guess in line of the global financial crisis, we can’t help but give Porsche a round of applause for the car’s fuel economy mechanism.
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Posted on
04.20.2010 @ 21:48