Latest comments:

Paint it black and it could be the next Batmobile. If Lamborghini didn’t have the name tied up, they should have named it Murciélago.
react...

I want this bike even a test ride would be great too.
react...

Leon would do good next year.
react...

Now this Helmet is what you need for protection.
react...

Riding this cafe racer bike on the race track would be nice.
react...

I hope the performance of this new FZ8 be good.
react...

25 that is good for Suzuki getting one of this edition would be nice.
react...

I always liked the original Katana but this custom looks great I want one.
react...

I’m not going to bother my self if I got into war, but I have to say that the best decent japanes design at that time, even now we haven’t seen any new supra & they’re still canceling alot of models was planned before, The only new one so far is the New Gt-r! there is no New NSX or RX7 & Supra at this time.

I admit supra, it’s one of the best japanese sport looking cars but to say the gt-r’s are supra wannabes are just so wrong against Gt-r fans.

The rear side looks like an old honda civic i know before, what wrong chevy? why your recent design looks so ugly & sometimes copied?
react...

I just seen one of those driving down the Autobahn on my way to Stuttgart from Munich. I didn’t know what it was because I couldn’t make out the name but now that I know, next I’ll be taking pictures.
react...

Are you very, very young? The GT-R’s 0-60 time of 3.3 was reported by a magazine; Nissan posts its time as 3.5, which is tested with one driver. The LFA’s 3.6 second time (gee, a 5 mph difference in top speed isn’t important but a 1/10 sec difference in 0-60 is, huh?) was tested by Lexus with two passengers, so if you’re going to compare apples to apple here the LFA is faster to 60. But that doesn’t matter too much, anyway, as you need to stop basing your knowledge on video game laps and realize that 0-60 isn’t all that matters on a track. And the LFA’s much higher price than the GT-R is not due to its higher top speed, as any intelligent person knows that top speed is not all that matters in a car. The LFA is the fastest nurburgring car in the world and a luxury cruiser at the same time, combining the performance of McLaren, the luxury of Aston Martin, the exclusivity of Bugatti and the reliability of Toyota, while the Nissan is a budget supercar for four. They are completely different types of automobiles, and just because they are both fast does not make them comparable. And as for the Koe segg’s higher top speed than the LFA, show me one track in the world (VW’s private test facility not withstanding) where you will actually hit 200 mph during a lap, let alone 250. And as for you’re statement that the CCXR was developed with top speed as a primary goal doesn’t mean that that’s all it’s good for - the hardly race-dependable R35 which you love so much was developed with the sole purpose of beating the 911 turbo, and even a Nissan-hater like me can see that it can accomplish much more than that. The CCXR was up until now the greatest supercar out there, and the LFA is the only car that can compete with it in terms of performance and luxury as far as I’m concerned.

Oh, and about you’re abnoxious fuel efficiency comment, if you would have actually bothered to read my comment you would realize that I was comparing the Supra and the R34 - not the LFA and the R35.

last i checked the r35 gtr posted a 0-60 time of 3.3 which happens to be faster than the LF-A’s time of 3.7 sec. the LF-A also costs in the 300k range as posted by car and driver. Also you can only rent the car for 2 yrs. then it is available for purchase..."all 500 units are being leased for 2 yrs" its top speed may beat the gt-r by a "staggering" 5 mph. for me i dont seen $200,000.00 justifying 5 mph difference. also they havn’t released any fuel ratings on the new LF-A yet so how can it be more fuel efficient than the GT-R and if you knew anything about engineering a 9000rpm redline v-10 can not possibly acheive better gas mileage than a twin turbo v-6... well if you plann on actually using the car to its full potential anyways. the koe segg may be better than all the other european cars in terms of performance around a track. ie. braking skidpad etc. but it was specifically designed to acheive a higher top speed than the mclaren F1 which it did. also if you’re going to compare a LF-A to the koe segg you should consider the 40+ mph difference in the top speed
react...

Sorry but this article is wrong.

AUDI is not listen in Latin, AUDI stands for Auto Union Deutchland Ingolstadt

since AUDI was a unification of 4 companies hence the four rings

Lol Supra wannabes...
react...