That’s unscientific and retarded. A 2006 Mustang GT goes 0-60 in 5.0 seconds, while the 2006 Monte SS is 5.5 (2005 was 6.7) seconds. Great looking Front Wheel Drive car. No front wheel drive car can even be considered truly high performance. By the way a 2005 Monte SS will struggle against a 2005 Mustang V6. How pathetic. Way to go GM; you built the coolest looking fake race car ever. The only part of a Mustang GT a Monte Carlo will see after 4 seconds are it’s taillights.
I hope that your SPECULATIVE GUESS about a 2014 ZO6 is correct, however I doubt it seriously. I am holding off for 2014 and a new ZO6. The Corvette Museum says "NO 2014 ZO6" but they are anticipating a HP Stingray for 2014. The order sheet for the 2014 Stingray is already a nightmare to interpret. Hope your predictions are spot on.
Please view my video and pass it on to your friends and colleagues. The more viewers I get, will support my case in the court of public opinion and pressure the three involved companies, Chrysler, Compuware d/b/a Professional Services, and Combustion Components to settle my 15 year homelessness.
Hi. The pictures of this new car, the Alfa Romeo 4C, are absolutely fantastic. The 4C is a completely technological new sports car with innovative technical features like the carbon fibre monocoque chassis that weighs just 65 kg and other lightweight materials like the high-strenght aluminium (to keep the weight of the car as low as possible), a brand-new four-cylinder 1.75-litre turbocharged engine with direct fuel injection, double continuous variable valve timing and a revolutionary scavenging pump system that eliminates turbo lag. This engine boosts out a maximum power output of 240 bhp and 258 lb-ft of torque. It is also mated to a 6-speed twin-dry-clutch automatic transmission (TCT) with launch control, that transfers power and torque to the rear wheels. In terms of performance, this car accelerates from 0-100 kph in 4.5 seconds and hits a top speed in excess of 250 kph (155 mph).
I owned a 1962 model of the FC. It was a weird truck to drive, but had more guts than needed. This is a concept truck we are looking at because it cannot ever go into production. Main reason is the fact that in a head on collision the driver has NO protection. If I could get one, I would do it in a heartbeat. For driving in the rough terrain it is ideal and would probably go any place a quad would go.
2002 Porsche 996 c4s, the car was performing fine till one day as you accelerate from stand still it just lost all power and would not perform as it should.After checking everything plugs filters no check engine light , scanned the car with no fault codes.Any suggestions ?.at the moment the car runs fine but lacks the power and the same thing happens at times when you take off it bogs .
I rebuilt a 1993 Vulcan EN500 that was on its way to the junk yard. I saw a lot of potential in it.
It was an easy motor to fix. Parts were moderately priced. The engine weighs only about 125 lb so I could get it on and off myself.
Clutch, carbs, trans, and drive are simple and rugged.
Motor has pretty good power for a 500, but kind of flattens out in performance around 70 MPH. Dropping from 6th to 5th to pass something at 60 doesn’t help all that much since gear ratio os pretty close. But mileage is twice as good as an 850 and i have no complaints.
This is an EXCELLENT first machine for ANY rider, unless the person is real big (over 6 and ft over 250 lbs).
It fits smaller people like me just right. Also, has a very low center of gravity and you can tip it at least 45 degrees before you feel like you are going to drop it.