Only two days after the White House said that the President would veto the Senate version of an energy bill that substantially raises the federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards and sets the same standard for trucks as for cars, one of the most prominent liberal Democrats has openly rebelled against the measure and its prime mover, Senate Majority Leader Reid of Nevada.
Carl Levin, a Senator from Michigan and normally an ally of Reid, has been rounding up Democratic opposition to the Senate bill. Levin opposed the measure was when it was adopted by the Senate in July. But House Energy Committee Chairman John Dingell, another Democrat from Michigan, was more successful in the House of Representatives. He killed the CAFE standard outright. In order to get an energy bill through the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi ultimately let the bill go to the floor with no fuel economy provision.
Last week, however, Pelosi and Reid pulled the bill from a conference committee in an effort to insert the Senate CAFE standards into the final bill.
Levin isn’t buying that stunt. One of the demands which will be made in his letter is the return of the measure to conference committee. He also wants separate standards for trucks and cars and a longer-time line for meeting new standards, as well as a credit against the standards for building alternate fuel vehicles. 
In a bizarre twist, Pelosi says that it’s the Republicans who are to blame for blocking the Senate bill. While Republicans have opposed the Senate bill, it was Pelosi’s unwillingness to accept the lower mileage standard increase supported by Dingell that led to the impasse in the House which resulted in no fuel economy provision at all being adopted there. She insisted on all or nothing – and got nothing.
Reid and Pelosi may now have made a serious tactical mistake by pulling the bill from conference committee. In so doing, they’ve created a new issue, one that has nothing to do with the merits of the legislation, but one that does impinge on the powers and privileges of the Senate members. Senator are accustomed to be able to exercise significant influence in conference committees over legislation which originated in a committee on which they sit. While Reid has pulled similar stunts a few times in the past to circumvent Republican opposition, he’s never before used it to make an end-run around a committee chairman from his own party, as he has done with Dingell this time. That move is likely to give pause to other Democrats in the Senate because it threatens their own power over other legislation.

Ralph Kalal
About the author
What do you think?
Show Comments


  (868) posted on 10.11.2010

This entire CAFE thing—unfortunately to be implemented in 2016—is a horrendous bill and something that I hope the Republicans will repeal when they take back Congress this mid-term. The democrats—so aptly represented by the jackass—fail to realize that just because something sounds great in theory doesn’t mean that it is practically applicable. Let’s all get better gas mileage and use less fuel. Sounds great, but it will kill the auto industry, and the American auto corporations will suffer the same fate that they did with the oil embargoes of the 1970’s. This will result in the production of cheap, gutless, unreliable cars that have no strength other than fuel economy; when’s the last time that you heard of someone who was satisfied with their Chevrolet Vega, Ford Pinto or second-generation Challenger? It will also force auto companies to use such technologies as diesel or hybrid powertrains, which will raise the price of cars across the board—especially deleterious to an industry already damaged by an ailing economy. In order to help compensate for this, the American corporations will start building even more cars in countries such as Mexico and China, which will only destroy more American jobs. This is just another example of the liberal democrats sacrificing the well-being of the country for their own political gain, this time under the nonexistent banner of man-made global warming.

  (815) posted on 10.11.2010

As much as I’d like to see an uncompetitive company fail (GM), I think Barack Obama has the right approach to this for this economic climate. I’m also curious to see what that "taxpayer stake" in an assisted automaker might mean.

  (1) posted on 10.29.2007

energybill2007 dot us is really informative in learning more about CAFE and RES provisions currently being debated in Congress. Pelosi and Reid are right in standing their guard against bullying like Dingell that lower the standards to play nice with the automobile industry. Go to the website and sign the petition if you think after 20 years of the same fuel standards, it is time for a change.

Car Finder: