To meet upcoming fuel economy requirements, automakers are expected to embrace turbocharging as a cost-effective way to maintain performance and increase fuel efficiency. In 2009, only five percent of vehicles offered for sale in the United States came with turbocharged engines. By 2020, an automotive industry executive expects that number to reach 82 percent, thanks to increasing fuel economy standards agreed to between the EPA, automakers, and the state of California. By 2025, automakers must achieve a Corporate Average Fuel Economy of 54.5 miles per gallon, fleet-wide. Producing smaller displacement, turbocharged engines is a cost-effective way of reducing fuel consumption, while maintaining expected levels of horsepower and performance.

There are a limited number of ways to achieve significantly better fuel economy from today’s cars. Going the hybrid drivetrain route adds expense, weight, and complexity, and using lightweight materials such as carbon fiber, composites, or aluminum usually have a significant increase in cost. Downsizing the engine is a one time-honored method, but American consumers are only willing to sacrifice so much performance in the name of better fuel economy.

Hit the jump for the full story.

Modern turbocharged engines have come a long way in the past few decades, and now feature technologies such as gasoline direct injection, variable valve timing, and variable intake length maximize performance while minimizing fuel consumption and emissions output. Higher compression ratios are possible, thanks to sophisticated knock-detection systems, which minimize the need for a substantial amount of boost to make reasonable power. The net result is engines that have very little turbo lag, and are far more durable than their forced-induction equivalents of a few decades back.

Your opinions on whether the new CAFE standard of 54.5 miles per gallon is a good thing or a bad thing may differ, but all of us can agree on this: more power plus increased fuel economy is a very good thing. Let us know what you think in the comments sections below.

Source: Automotive News

About the author
What do you think?
Show Comments


  (331) posted on 09.7.2011

Yeah! This is much better than the supercharged vehicle. When it comes to performance no one can beat the turbocharged.

  (365) posted on 09.7.2011

I agree that turbocharged produce an impressive amount of power. However, too sad that they are quite expensive. But still there’s growing demand for this technology.

  (415) posted on 08.11.2011

It’s a good news for all nature lovers and environmentalist.. At least automakers are cooperating with them and doing something to lessen their car’s emission. I’m glad to hear that. Let’s support the clean air act for a healthy environment.

  (518) posted on 08.4.2011

Well, I don’t think that it’s good to compare the supercharged and turbocharged engine. Downsizing the weight of the car or using a lighter material like carbon-fiber material will help to the increase in the power output of the car. 

  (359) posted on 08.4.2011

Basically, turbocharged is more powerful compare to the supercharged engine. However, the turbocharged engine quite expensive compared to later. However,it helps to reduce fuel consumption and maintain the high speed performance of the engine. 

  (399) posted on 08.3.2011

Well, a nice idea for the government. I thought they are not noticing that there is a price hike in fuels. Hopefully, this turbo charged idea will be released immediately because people are now expecting on this stuff.

Car Finder: